The Chief's GauntletsHalo 3
Posted 22 May 2008 - 11:55 PM
Posted 23 May 2008 - 02:21 AM
No you're just not allowed to play the part of the antagonistic ass. (That part is reserved for Blaze or his understudy.)
[B]ut come on, I'm not allowed to use real world example to show that another view has no evidence with which to stand upon?
Posted 23 May 2008 - 03:39 AM
And you're not allowed to play the part of Cpt. Double Post.
No, you're just not allowed to play the part of the antagonistic ass. (That part is reserved for Blaze or his understudy.)
Edited by Kinetic, 23 May 2008 - 03:39 AM.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:09 AM
I don't know that anyone has congratulated themselves in this thread yet and if I've repeated myself or others have echoed my opinion, I'm sure it's likely because they agree with me or because they think I needed to be repeated for some to understand. I said one thing and you said another as indicated by your response: No they wouldn't, Voc. to my statement: If that idea [of God and their faith] is proven to be false, there would likely be a moral fallout of incredible proportions. How am I to understand that you are referencing anything other than the idea that you reject my argument that there would be "moral fallout of incredible proportions" in the wake of the events of Halo 3? Regardless if one or one billion Elites still cling to the promise of the Great Journey, the reality stands that there would be, as Falkor aptly put, "global meltdown." I've argued nothing to the contrary.
I see nothing but double speak and self-congratulations here for arriving at the same conclusion and a couple posts that say I'm wrong, but end in something along the lines of, "But it's entirely possible there'd be civil war."
You never said anything of the sort, Anpheus. Quote the portion where you offered the variety of possible social outcomes which could/would result in the wake of the events of Halo 3. Maybe you're remember what I wrote, but I can't recall you anything of the sort. What did you say? You simply provided examples in current religious units to support the single notion that Sangheili would still believe the lies of the Prophets. You never offered disambiguation or elaboration on anything other than that, save for the negative barbs about religion you were aptly able to integrate into your statements.
What is this argument even about, can anyone clue me in? I elaborated, I used examples, I said, there will be Sangheili that reject the evidence presented to them, there will be Sangheili that disagree with the military's view that their religion was a sham.
When did I say it wouldn't? Please quote me. Accurately this time. And when did you "accept there is the possibility of civil war" through implication, inference or outright declaration? Please quote. Perhaps I misunderstood your original statement, but I think you've assumed a lot. Keep in mind that I was responding to someone who said that the Sangheili culture would go on as they were before the Covenant and your first response to me was "No" followed by no assertion of agreement with anything else that I said in either two posts.
We're arguing over one single thing, we all accept there is the possibility of civil war within the species of the Covenant, as well as, obviously, between the species of the Covenant, but we disagree over one thing: will the Covenant belief system remain in any single individual?
But you already have and that's my point, Anpheus. I like you and I love a good-spirited debate, but you have to admit that when you use words like this you're not looking to fill in gaps in an existing conversation with your opinion - you're looking to start a fight:
Eegad, if you guys want a discussion about religion versus Atheism, make a topic and I'll gladly represent my views...
- mob mentality
Posted 23 May 2008 - 10:45 AM
Posted 23 May 2008 - 11:06 AM
Posted 23 May 2008 - 11:11 AM
Doesn?t this just prove Voc?s opinion further? People get angry when others even allude to something they believe in is false. This causes unrest.
If you want to start a different topic about how you are offended by such terms, then I would gladly argue those points there. I don't think you should be so offended by them.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 11:39 AM
Posted 23 May 2008 - 11:51 AM
I think I agree with you that there'll be unrest.
I argued, specifically, that there will be a large number of Sangheili that disagree with the military about their religious beliefs being wrong.
PS: Why does this even matter? Then again, I love to argue pointless points.
Edited by Nightshade, 23 May 2008 - 11:51 AM.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 12:14 PM
Their core, pre-Covenant religion was based on the belief that the Forerunners were gods. Their species-wide goal pre-Covenant still revolved around finding Forerunner artifacts. This has been proven (to the Arbiter and 'Vadum, as well as their crew) to be a false belief - unfounded and based on lies and misunderstanding. Now that their religious belief system is gone you don't think there will be any turmoil or social issues at all? The destruction of the Covenant and the beliefs that were championed by it would seem to me to have catastrophic effects on the Sangheilian social landscape.
Imagine if tomorrow the world discovered irrefutable evidence that there was no God. All of the folds of modern religion, particularly Christianity, Islam, Judaism would fall into disarray. Now whether or not there is a God really isn't the point, the point is that a rather large some of our planet's population bases their life, their future and security beyond death on the idea that God exists. If that idea is proven to be false, there would likely be a moral fallout of incredible proportions.
Fallout? Yes. Totally. Proven to be false? In whose eyes? Certainly not each and every Sangheili.
But the point is that the Arbiter, Half-Jaw and all of the other Covenant leaders know that it's false. What if the Pope, the councilmen of the Methodist Church, and the leaders of the Baptist Association, and the leaders of every world religion all presented irrevocable facts to their followers that disproved the existence of god and then disbanded their respective organizations? We're not talking about a prophecy or prediction coming true or not coming true. We're talking about the leaders of a major religion realizing beyond the shadow of a doubt that their religion is false and then reporting that back to their people.
So their military comes back and reports one thing, and the people believe another. Still going to be tumultuous? Yes. For the same reason? Sort of. But will the Covenant belief system totally disappear? No.
Everyone after Voc's reply attempted to say I was wrong while reiterating the same view, there would be a societal meltdown, that there would be turmoil, etc. But at the same time, accepting the same flawed idea that every single Covenant believer would change their mind, that there would be no more Covenant belief system, etc. Some people even reinforced my point of view by reiterating that the Covenant is a religion that is at least an order of magnitude more severe, more zealous than any on Earth. Ok, so if we presume that to be true, would there not be even more hesitation to believe the returning military, as opposed to less?
Edited by Anpheus, 23 May 2008 - 12:15 PM.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 12:51 PM
Proven to be false? In whose eyes? Certainly not each and every Sangheili.
But will the Covenant belief system totally disappear? No.
Dude, who did they accept this from? Who? Me? Really? Did you even read my last post?
at the same time, accepting the same flawed idea that every single Covenant believer would change their mind
I'll tell you what, Anpheus. I'm kind of glad you've dodged the vast majority of quotes I requested from you before, because it gives me an opportunity to ace this argument in one post.
- Provide me the statement (anywhere in this thread) in which I said that every last Sangheili would disregard the Covenant religion? It has to be there right? Otherwise it would mean that your statement "No, it wouldn't, Voc" and everything which followed would be without warrant.
- Provide me the statement in which you agreed that there would be civil war, that there would be turmoil or that there would be anything but Sangheili refusing to give up the promise of the Great Journey (in your first two posts which sparked this conversation to begin with - not after I put your argument in a headlock and made you finally say it).
Yet you still assume such: "If you want to start a different topic about how you are offended by such terms, then I would gladly argue those points there. I don't think you should be so offended by them."
I'm personally not offended by anything you've said but I'm pretty certain that the 50%+ of the population of our planet might have a good portion of people who don't like being called brainwashed victims of group-think and mob mentality following 'truth.' Is this a compliment where you come from? Does this make people want to believe you, the beholder of all truth and wisdom, or do you think you might be starting a fire where none need be?
Posted 23 May 2008 - 01:08 PM
Also, while were at it. Here?s hoping Halo 4: Dark Planetoid Rising: Finish the Fight (You started and finished) has a mode where you play as the Arbiter running for president of Sanghelios. Getting to duke it out and run your opponents through the mud. But it won?t be easy, you will have to fight your way to the top against Half-Jaw (He was once in a human prison camp, so he?s got the warrior vote.) A new elite by the name of Oarack Bbama, the new elite rallying for change from the old not so hip Covenant. And who could forget that loveable candidate no one cares about, Hillary Clinton.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 01:34 PM
You clearly, specifically said the Covenant and its beliefs would be destroyed. Here's a couple quotes:
Now that their religious belief system is gone
The destruction of the Covenant and the beliefs that were championed by it
What did you mean by that if not the literal interpretation?
Posted 23 May 2008 - 01:46 PM
I'm pretty certain that the 50%+ of the population of our planet might have a good portion of people who don't like being called brainwashed victims of group-think and mob mentality following 'truth.'
This just became my new favorite quote.
Thank of it as the American Civil War, Anpheus. When the North defeated the South, the Southern people were not very happy. Even though the states below the Mason-Dixon (sp?) line were not permitted to use slavery, the Southern people still tried to get it back. They did not aggree with the North.
Some of the Southern people accepted Abe's philosophy, but some didn't go down without a fight. Now just substitute muzzel-loaded rifles with plasma rifles and there ya go. Same thing.
Moral of the stroy: Don't argue with Voc unless you enjoy getting your face crushed by a steam roller.
Hope my story helped. I'm sure it somehow doesn't have anything to do with the argument, but I tried my best.
Edited by Stormtrooper30, 23 May 2008 - 01:48 PM.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 02:47 PM
I don't even think anyone reading this conversation knows what I'm arguing for given the replies I've seen since Voc's post. The fact that someone, Stormtrooper, just posted something like that, that completely agrees with what I've said earlier, then... I don't know, this is ridiculous to me.
As I said earlier, my mind, it is boggled. I've said the same thing consistently that I don't think the Covenant religion will simply disappear, be vanquished, be "destroyed" in Voc's own words.
Posted 23 May 2008 - 04:55 PM
Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:02 PM
Posted 24 May 2008 - 03:06 AM
Posted 24 May 2008 - 06:56 AM
Edited by slurpeekilla, 24 May 2008 - 06:56 AM.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Halo 3
Original Trilogy →
Original Trilogy →
Original Trilogy →
Original Trilogy →
Original Trilogy →
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users